Nonetheless, Apple yet has to develop a GPU that will offer performance on par with discrete desktop GPUs from Nvidia.
Adobe dimension m1 pro#
Since Apple has not provided them, we have to fetch such information from other sources, which is not 100% accurate, but this is all we have at this point.Īpple clearly positions its M1 Pro and M1 Max system-on-chips for workstation applications, so while it is fun to see how the M1 Max SoC compares to CPUs and discrete GPUs in things like GFXBench 5 or Geekbench 5, these are certainly not workloads that this chip was designed for.Īdobe's Premiere Pro 15.4.1 is one of the programs that will be used on the new MacBook Pro laptops and performance in this program shows that Apple's latest M1 Max SoC has an industry-leading media playback engine, state-of-the-art general-purpose CPU cores, and a GPU that can outrival standalone mobile GPUs from Nvidia in Premiere Pro. While we can expect the new SoCs to offer a good balance between performance and power consumption, just like M1, specifics are important. When Apple introduced its M1 Pro and M1 Max earlier this week, it did not demonstrate their performance in any specific workstation application, but focused on performance and power consumption in a host of programs and compared its CPU and GPU performance to that of other notebooks.
Adobe dimension m1 mac#
But Apple's new integrated GPU cannot get close to performance levels offered by desktop discrete graphics cards, something that Apple needs for its Mac Pro workstations.
The new M1 Max SoC can also compete very well against standalone mobile GPUs, namely the GeForce RTX 3060 and RTX 3080 (which seems strangely slow in this benchmark), in Premier Pro while consuming much less power.
Adobe dimension m1 professional#
GPU ScoreĪdobe's Premiere Pro is one of those professional applications that can take advantage of GPU compute capabilities, so it is not surprising that the new MacBook Pro with its 32-cluster custom GPU with 4096 ALUs annihilates AMD's Radeon Pro 5500M used in previous-generation MacBook Pro workstations. We suspect that Apple's M1 Max outshines the competition in heavy CPU effects sequences, but falls behind in heavy GPU effects sequences, so it really depends on the exact workload whether the new MBPs provide a better experience than other platforms or cannot keep up with the rivals. It still makes a lot of sense because real-world workflows may require different types of effects. It is necessary to point out that PugetBench for Premiere Pro's Export workloads include heavy CPU effects and heavy GPU effects sequences, so overall score is somewhat mixed. The new MacBook Pro 16 clearly outperforms its predecessor in Export workloads, but is somewhat behind other high-end laptops and is drastically behind advanced desktops. Those who edit video will certainly appreciate Apple's M1 Max since based on PugetBench for Premiere Pro 0.95.1, the new MacBook Pro systems promise a very smooth experience that will be even better than that on beefy desktops. What is interesting, though, is how well the M1 processor’s Neural Engine works with Adobe’s AI-driven Sensei technologies.Apple's M1 Max clearly has an excellent media playback engine that outperforms not only standalone mobile GPUs, but even Nvidia's top-of-the-range GeForce RTX 3090. Adobe points out that some processes may still be faster on Intel machines with powerful GPUs, and the M1 architecture limits the RAM to a maximum of 16GB, which is not a lot for real power users. So just how good is the new Apple M1 processor?Īdobe’s independent tests reflect our own benchmarking data for Apple’s new M1 machines, and the performance gains are typically substantial and sometimes spectacular. Playback performance can be a bugbear on lower-powered machines, and the M1 MacBook managed to play back XAVC S 100p and iPhone 4K 60p footage at their nominal speed, while the Intel MacBook could only manage 18fps and 48fps respectively.Scene Edit detection uses Adobe Sensei AI, and here the M1 processor’s Neural Engine delivered a huge 5x speed improvement over the Intel-equipped MacBook.Encoding XAVC S 4K 25p to ProRes 422 proved more than 2x faster, though Adobe does point out that the gains from other encoding combinations were more modest.Importing XAVC S 4K 100p footage was almost three times faster with the M1-powered MacBook.With video production now as important for content creators as still photography, the performance gains for Premiere Pro are just as important, and Adobe reports an 77.57% overall performance gain from the new M1 processor. (Image credit: Adobe) (opens in new tab) Premiere Pro performance gains with the Apple M1 processor
0 kommentar(er)
